If you saw a post claiming California’s new law bans creatine, green tea extract, raspberry ketone, garcinia cambogia or green coffee bean extract, here is what the bill text actually says. California AB 2030, approved September 28, 2026, names those five ingredients only as factors a court may weigh. What it restricts is sales of weight-loss and muscle-building supplements to people under 18. Whether a product is covered depends on how it is labeled, marketed and represented, not on the ingredient alone. The chaptered text was approved and filed September 28, 2026, and the effective date should be confirmed on the California Legislature’s site. The sections below walk through the text, the dates and the common mix-ups.
Quick facts as of 2026-11-09
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Bill | California AB 2030 (2025-2026 session), author Lowenthal |
| Status | Approved by the Governor and filed September 28, 2026, as Chapter 720, Statutes of 2026 |
| Who is protected | Persons under 18 in California |
| What is covered | Over-the-counter diet pills and dietary supplements labeled, marketed or otherwise represented for weight loss or muscle building |
| Prescription exception | A person under 18 with a prescription for the product |
| Adults | The section does not apply to a person 18 or older |
| Penalty | Civil penalty of no more than $500 per violation |
| Named ingredients | Creatine, green tea extract, raspberry ketone, garcinia cambogia and green coffee bean extract, listed as factors a court may consider |
| Effective date | To be confirmed on the California Legislature’s site; approved and filed September 28, 2026 |
Is creatine or green tea extract banned under AB 2030?
No. The bill does not ban any ingredient on its own. Its wording covers products that are labeled, marketed or otherwise represented for weight loss or muscle building. Subdivision (e) of the chaptered text lists creatine, green tea extract, raspberry ketone, garcinia cambogia and green coffee bean extract as things a court may consider. That list is about factors, not a ban on the ingredient name.
Why does coverage turn on labeling and marketing?
The chaptered text says a court may consider four kinds of facts:
- Whether the product contains an FDA-approved weight-loss or muscle-building ingredient, a steroid, or one of the five named ingredients.
- Whether the label or marketing says or shows that the product will help modify, maintain or reduce body weight, fat, appetite or metabolism, or help maintain or increase muscle or strength. The words “express or imply” are in the text.
- Whether the product or its ingredients are otherwise represented for weight loss or muscle building.
- What the store or online seller does, such as placing signs or tags with those claims, or grouping the product with weight-loss or muscle-building products.
The Council for Responsible Nutrition, the supplement trade group, says courts could consider implied claims and shelf placement. It also says the wording could reach fiber and protein supplements, general wellness products and multivitamins (Chain Drug Review report on CRN’s statement).
What does AB 2030 actually do?
The bill bars selling, offering to sell or giving away, as a retail or wholesale promotion, an over-the-counter diet pill or a dietary supplement for weight loss or muscle building to anyone under 18 in California. Delivery sellers, including online retailers, may not sell, deliver or cause delivery of these products to anyone under 18 in the state.
Online and mail sellers can meet the rule in one of two ways. They can check the buyer’s full name, birth date and address against a commercially available database built mainly from government data. Or they can use a delivery method that requires an adult 18 or older to sign, with a government photo ID.
Stores must request valid ID when staff cannot reasonably determine that a buyer appears to be under 18. They may also limit access to these products. A violation carries a civil penalty of no more than $500 per violation. The Attorney General, a county counsel or a city attorney can seek a court injunction, and a prevailing plaintiff can recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
What does the law not do?
- It does not ban the named ingredients.
- It does not apply to a person 18 or older.
- It does not apply to a person under 18 who has a prescription for the product.
- It covers only products labeled, marketed or otherwise represented for weight loss or muscle building, under its definitions.
Who does AB 2030 affect?
| Who | What the bill does |
|---|---|
| Shoppers under 18 | Cannot buy covered products without a prescription |
| Parents and teens | Covered products cannot be sold to a minor without a prescription, and the prescription is the exception |
| Stores and pharmacies | Must request valid ID when they cannot reasonably determine that a buyer appears to be under 18, and may limit access to these products. Retail establishments include pharmacies and grocery stores |
| Online and delivery sellers | Cannot ship to anyone under 18 in California, and must use either the database check or the adult-signature delivery method |
| Adults 18 and older | Not covered by this section |
When does it start?
The Governor approved AB 2030 and it was filed with the Secretary of State on September 28, 2026. Confirm the effective date on the California Legislature’s site.
| Date | What happened |
|---|---|
| October 25, 2023 | New York’s governor signed the first state law of its kind (Keating Muething & Klekamp summary of New York’s law) |
| April 2024 | New York’s law was set to take effect |
| May 2024 | A federal court denied New York’s motion to dismiss CRN’s First Amendment claims (Nutrition Insight report on CRN’s lawsuit) |
| March 2026 | CRN petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review New York’s law |
| September 28, 2026 | AB 2030 approved and filed as Chapter 720 |
What are the common mix-ups?
- “It bans creatine.” Creatine appears only in the factor list. The bill points to labeling and marketing.
- “Any supplement with these ingredients is banned for kids.” The ingredient is one factor among several. The label, claims, and store placement also count.
- The bill’s definition of retail establishment includes pharmacies, grocery stores and online vendors.
- “California’s law is the same as New York’s.” CRN describes the California measure as closely tracking New York’s 2023 law.
Is green tea extract safe? What the research says
For the marketing claims around green tea, read our page on the truth about green tea fat burning. The Cleveland Clinic’s article on green tea extract says it contains caffeine, and that overdoing it has been linked to liver problems (Cleveland Clinic green tea extract article). The article also says federal labeling does not require food and drink makers to list the amount of green tea extract or EGCG.
On weight, the article says research has found green tea extract can help lower the number on the scale, and it quotes one study describing that link as “modest at best.” It also cites one study of a 379 mg daily dose that found it can help improve blood pressure and cholesterol numbers. A 2022 review in Molecules says studies of green tea extract have raised concerns including hepatotoxicity and DNA damage (2022 green tea review in Molecules). For a deeper look at the human trials, see green tea extract human studies (our research library).
For green coffee bean extract, see what green coffee bean extract trials found (our research library). Plant extracts sold alongside these products, such as ginger root extract, have their own pages on this site.
| Ingredient | Named in the bill’s factor list | What to know or do next |
|---|---|---|
| Green tea extract | Yes | Contains caffeine; liver problems linked to overdoing it |
| Green coffee bean extract | Yes | See our research library page on green coffee bean extract |
| Creatine | Yes | Ask a pharmacist what research exists before you buy |
| Garcinia cambogia | Yes | Ask a pharmacist what research exists before you buy |
| Raspberry ketone | Yes | Ask a pharmacist what research exists before you buy |
What do NIH and FDA say about these ingredients in general?
MedlinePlus, the U.S. National Library of Medicine’s topic page, says supplements do not have to go through the testing that drugs do. The page lists the NIH Office of Dietary Supplements as a source of trustworthy information. Its safety steps are to tell your health care provider about any supplement you use, not to take a bigger dose than the label recommends, and to check with your provider before surgery (MedlinePlus dietary supplements topic page).
The FDA’s labeling guide says the definition of a dietary supplement includes herbs and other botanicals, and extracts and concentrates (FDA supplement labeling guide). FDA says a product intended to treat, diagnose, prevent, mitigate or may help support disease is a drug, even when it is marketed as a supplement. Makers may describe how a product affects the body’s structure or function if they can substantiate the claim. The label must then carry the disclaimer “This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.”
FDA’s May 2022 document warns that supplements can have strong effects. Risks rise when people combine them with prescription or over-the-counter medicines, take them instead of medicines, take high doses, or use them around lab work or surgery. FDA also says some products sold as supplements contain hidden drug ingredients, including sibutramine, sildenafil, tadalafil and phenolphthalein (FDA’s May 2022 supplement claims document). If you think a supplement caused a bad reaction, stop using it and report it through the FDA’s Safety Reporting Portal.
Is the law being challenged?
Yes, in New York. CRN has petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review the 2023 New York law, arguing it raises First Amendment concerns. CRN says California’s measure closely tracks it. CRN’s lawsuit against New York’s law survived an early stage: a federal court denied the state’s motion to dismiss CRN’s claim that the law infringes on lawful commercial speech.
Questions that settle your decision
- Is the buyer under 18? If not, this section does not apply.
- Does the label, marketing, or shelf placement say weight loss or muscle building? The bill makes those factors a court may weigh.
- Does the buyer have a prescription for the product? If so, the exception applies.
- Does the seller ship to California? If so, the delivery rules apply.
Questions to ask a clinician
- Is green tea extract a concern with the other medicines I take?
- How much caffeine from supplements is too much for me?
- Would a prescription change how this law applies to my teen?
- What research exists for raspberry ketone or garcinia cambogia in people like me?
Who to ask about your situation
If your situation is specific, ask a California attorney or the Attorney General’s office.
By Gut, Gum and Nail Health Editorial Team
This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult your doctor or qualified healthcare provider before making changes to your health routine.